Montana Federal Court Rules USFWS Violated ESA Over Gray Wolf Decision, Orders Agency Back To Drawing Board

A federal district court in Missoula has ruled that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act when it determined that gray wolves in the western U.S. do not warrant federal protections. The ruling means that the Service’s finding that gray wolves in the West do not qualify for listing is vacated and sent back to the agency for a new decision, consistent with the ESA and best available science.

In January, 10 conservation groups challenged the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s denial of their petitions to list a western U.S. distinct population segment (DPS) of gray wolves under the ESA, or alternatively, to relist the northern Rocky Mountain DPS, which Congress “delisted” in 2011.

Despite denying that the petitioned protections were warranted, the agency also concluded that laws and regulations in Montana and Idaho “designed to substantially reduce” wolf populations are “at odds with modern professional wildlife management.”

The court ordered the agency to go back to the drawing board and re-analyze threats to the gray wolf population in the West in accordance with the requirements of the ESA, including the requirement to use the best available science.

Specifically, the court noted the agency failed to consider the species’ lost historic range throughout the West in its assessment, neglected to properly evaluate whether wolves in Colorado qualify as a significant portion of its range, failed to properly evaluate threats to wolves on the West Coast, failed to apply the best available science on population estimates and genetic threat from small population size, incorrectly assumed connectivity amongst wolves in the West would continue (despite high levels of mortality in the Northern Rockies), arbitrarily relied on state commitments to stop killing wolves at certain thresholds (without considering what would happen if they were breached), failed to account for unlawful take, and relied on inadequate state and federal regulatory mechanisms.

Wolves remain in the political crosshairs. In January, U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo, introduced H.R. 845 to strip ESA protections from gray wolves across the lower 48. If passed, this bill would congressionally delist all gray wolves in the lower 48 the same way wolves in the Northern Rockies were congressionally delisted in 2011, handing management authority over to states. Regulations in Montana, for example, allow hunters and trappers to kill several hundred wolves per year—with another 500-wolf quota proposed this year—with bait, traps, snares, night hunting, infrared and thermal imagery scopes, and artificial light.

The conservation organizations that filed the case are Western Watersheds Project, WildEarth Guardians, International Wildlife Coexistence Network, Predator Defense, Protect the Wolves, Trap Free Montana, Wilderness Watch, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Friends of the Clearwater, and Nimiipuu Protecting the Environment. They are represented by the Western Environmental Law Center. Two other groups of conservation organizations also sued the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service for its decision to deny the petitions to protect wolves across the West. The three cases were consolidated and heard together on June 18 in Missoula, Montana.

“We feel vindicated by today’s ruling. Anti-wildlife politicians in the Northern Rockies are managing wolves back to the brink of extinction, and it has to stop before the wolf population collapses under state management,” said Lizzy Pennock, carnivore coexistence attorney at WildEarth Guardians. “Today’s ruling is a huge step in the right direction, finally putting us back on the path to protecting this imperiled and iconic native species at a time when Montana’s wildlife agency has proposed hunting and trapping regulations that could wipe out Montana’s wolf population.”

“Today’s ruling represents a hopeful step towards giving wolves in the Northern Rockies the federal protections they so desperately need,” said Patrick Kelly, Montana director for Western Watersheds Project. “These native carnivores have been subject to years of brutal, unscientific anti-wolf hysteria that has swept legislatures and wildlife agencies in states like Montana and Idaho. With Montana set to approve a 500 wolf kill quota at the end of August, this decision could not have come at a better time. Wolves may now have a real shot at meaningful recovery.”

More news from CBB: